Sleeping Practising Advocate can not be appointed as a CS of the company.

This order show that sleeping practising advocate can not be appointed as a company secretary of the company. In this case tribunal accepted that CS Rajiv Bajaj doing sleeping practice of advocacy with CS job in Panasonic AVC Networks India Limited.

BIG Salute for ICSI Governance and Double Salute to CS Rajiv BajajApplication No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_001Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_002Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_003Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_004Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_005Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_006Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_007Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_008Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_009Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_010Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_011Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_012Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_013Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_014Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_015Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_016Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_017Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_018Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_019Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_020Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_021Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_022Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_023Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_024Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_025Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_026Application No. 1-2015 - Shri Hitender Kumar Mehta Vs Shri Rajiv Bajaj_027

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Sleeping Practising Advocate can not be appointed as a CS of the company.

  1. The Order of Election Tribunal is Valid, however, based on thorough study of the case, I conclude that Sleeping Practicing Advocate can not be appointed as CS of the Company, Respondent is definitely guilty of professional code of misconduct and he is liable to be punished in the court of law or elsewhere, the only thing was that Election Tribunal has no jurisdiction to look after the code of misconduct as prescribed by the Institute, On request or by order, Institute too can take disciplinary action against respondent on the ground of professional code of misconduct.

    HEADING should be changed accordingly, SLEEPING PRACTICING ADVOCATE CAN NOT BE APPOINTED AS CS OF THE COMPANY

    Like

Comments are closed.